My interview with the Scott Wartman was in the Cincinnati Enquirer on Wednesday, March 13th. 

It was a fair article but the key is the final paragraph:

Abrams did not respond to messages and questions sent by The Enquirer. She told Gongwer News Service she stands by her vote. "I voted for what was best for the institution – that being the Ohio House," Abrams told Gongwer.

• First question:
  • Why is she so afraid to talk to reporters, radio hosts or anyone that can ask a question???
• Real question:
  • Why is her explaination the she voted with the entire Democrat caucus was that was "best for the institution"???
    • What about voting for what is best for the constituents?
    • Does she actually believe that the goal of a Republican supermajority is to break rank with the majority of the Republicans and to vote with the Democrats?
    • If it really was best for the "institution", why did the Ohio Republican Party vote to censure her for this supposedly "best" vote?

Do we really want someone to "represent us" that is beholden to the liberal wing of the Republicans and to the Democrats?

Cindy Abrams has never had a challenger and is unapologetic about her joining the Democrats to disrupt Ohio's conservative initiatives. Her campaign dwarfs ours by a factor of 10 to 1.  She has spread a neverending and increasingly rediculous claims about what we stand for.

Elections should be based on facts and qualifications, not on the size of your checkbook and your ability to promulgate lies.

Do your homework and pick the candidate most likely to follow through for you in Columbus!